Skip to content

HealthUnited States6 min read

“Flicker Stage” of Aging: Can You Feel Younger?

The 'flicker stage' of aging suggests your functional age can fluctuate. Authors Stuart Kaplan & Marcus Riley explain how lifestyle triggers let you feel younger.

Share

Topics

Authors argue aging is not fixed — new “flicker stage” idea says you can feel younger again

Authors Stuart Kaplan and Marcus Riley challenge traditional views on aging with a new “flicker stage” in Your Aging Advantage — a phase where functional “feels-like” age can fluctuate, letting people temporarily feel younger through lifestyle triggers.

  • Flicker-stage concept: Functional age can move up or down, not only forward, according to the authors’ seven-stage model.
  • Actionable triggers: Physical, psychological, social and environmental “flicker triggers” — like exercise or renewed social connection — may flip someone to a younger-feeling stage.
  • Behavioral, not molecular: The model is a lifestyle and coaching framework, distinct from lab-based cellular or epigenetic reversal research.

Key information and sources

Your Aging Advantage, by Stuart Kaplan and Marcus Riley, introduces the “flicker stage” as one of seven stages of aging and argues that functional age — what people feel — can move up or down rather than only forward. The authors discussed the idea in a televised segment; see the Fox News interview with the authors.

The book contrasts feels-like or functional age with chronological age and urges people to focus on “aging on pace” instead of assuming fixed limits such as age 65 as a biological cliff. Source: the Fox News segment.

The authors identify “flicker triggers” — physical, psychological, social or environmental changes such as exercise or renewed social connection — that they say can flip someone back to a younger-feeling stage. See the Fox News interview for examples.

The flicker-stage concept is behavioral and lifestyle-focused; it does not rely on new laboratory findings. Separate scientific reporting explores cellular and epigenetic approaches to reversing biological aging — these are lab- and animal-model based. For context, see a recorded talk on David Sinclair’s research, a study report on chemical means to reverse cellular aging, news about an early human trial greenlit by the FDA, and coverage of remarks on reversibility of aging at a global forum reported at the World Government Summit.

What the authors say: a new way to think about getting older

Kaplan and Riley explain the flicker stage as part of a seven-stage model in Your Aging Advantage. They describe how people often feel younger or older than their birth-certificate age and how those feelings can change. Marcus Riley notes that stress or setbacks may make someone feel older, but those shifts are not necessarily permanent; deliberate actions — what the authors call “flicker triggers” — can move a person back to a younger-feeling stage. (Source: Fox News interview.)

“Think of lived age like a weather report — the number is one thing, but humidity changes how it feels,” Kaplan says, using that comparison to explain the idea of a “feels-like” age that matters to daily life.

They encourage readers to focus on “aging on pace” — choosing whether to continue working, change careers, or pursue hobbies — rather than accepting age 65 as a universal cutoff. (Source: Fox News segment.)

What the flicker stage looks like in real life

The authors describe the flicker stage as brief periods when someone feels notably younger — more energy, sharper thinking, stronger mobility — followed by stretches when they feel their chronological age. Their prescription: identify personal flicker triggers (such as exercise, reconnecting with friends, or a meaningful project) and use them intentionally to “flicker back” to the desired stage. (Source: Fox News interview.)

How this idea fits with scientific research

Key distinction: Kaplan and Riley’s model is a psychosocial, behavioral framework based on observation and coaching. It is not presented as a molecular or laboratory finding.

Meanwhile, laboratory researchers — including teams associated with Harvard’s David Sinclair — are exploring epigenetic reprogramming and chemical approaches that can reset youthful cellular states in mice and cells. Those lines of work involve gene therapies or chemical cocktails and are distinct from the authors’ lifestyle-focused claims. For deeper context, see a recorded talk, a study report, reporting on an FDA-greenlit human study related to Sinclair’s theory, and a conference report of remarks on reversibility.

Reporting gaps and source limits

Mainstream coverage of Kaplan and Riley’s book is limited. Much of the publicity has come through a single Fox News segment. There is not yet peer-reviewed research or broad journalistic validation treating the flicker stage as an experimentally tested scientific concept. Readers should consider the model a lifestyle framework until future studies test its claims.

Practical steps the authors recommend

Kaplan and Riley emphasize simple, actionable steps tied to flicker triggers:

  • Regular exercise — movement that boosts energy and mobility.
  • Renewed social connection — relationships that restore purpose and engagement.
  • Purposeful projects or work — tasks that stimulate cognition and identity.
  • Environmental changes — settings that encourage activity and mental engagement.

Their message emphasizes personal responsibility and choice: individuals can take intentional, private actions to aim for better function and decide whether to keep working or shift roles. (Source: Fox News discussion.)

Why the idea may appeal to conservative readers

The flicker-stage idea resonates with audiences who value personal control. It reframes aging as a set of choices rather than an inevitable, uniform decline dictated by government or society. Kaplan’s critique of treating age 65 as a biological limit echoes conservative arguments to rethink one-size-fits-all retirement rules and empower individual decision-making. (Source: Fox News.)

Implications for Walla Walla, Washington

Economic impact

  • Workforce choices: Walla Walla’s agriculture, wineries and small businesses may benefit if older workers remain active, keeping experience in the labor pool and easing pressure on pensions and services.
  • Local businesses: Fitness centers, community centers and healthcare providers could see demand for programs that support people aiming to “flicker back” — targeted exercise classes, social-connection programs and retraining workshops.

Political consequences

  • Retirement policy debate: The book’s pushback against the 65-as-decline norm may revive local and state discussions about retirement age, workforce incentives and disability rules.
  • Public programs: Officials could face calls to favor active-aging initiatives (programs that promote engagement) instead of expanding passive benefits if the idea gains traction.

Social effects

  • Community engagement: Civic and faith groups could be hubs for social flicker triggers — church programs, veterans’ groups and civic clubs may help residents regain purpose and vitality.
  • Family dynamics: Emphasizing lived age could shift caregiving expectations and encourage families to support older relatives in staying active rather than assuming decline.

Cultural relevance

Walla Walla’s local values — hard work, entrepreneurship and community ties — align with a message of choice and self-reliance. Visible examples of older residents staying active (working in vineyards, mentoring youth, running businesses) can reinforce the flicker-stage model.

Practical applications for residents

  • Employers: Small employers and wineries can offer flexible roles or phased retirement to keep experienced staff engaged.
  • Healthcare and fitness providers: Clinics and gyms can market programs around functional age, social connection and resilience.
  • Individuals: Residents can try practical flicker triggers — regular walking or farming work, joining community groups, or taking on meaningful projects — to see what helps them feel younger.

Sources and further reading

Primary interview and book discussion: Fox News interview with Stuart Kaplan and Marcus Riley on the flicker stage.

Background on laboratory research exploring reversal of cellular aging: a video discussion of David Sinclair’s research; a study report on chemical means to reverse cellular aging; news on an FDA-greenlit study related to Sinclair’s aging theory; and coverage of Sinclair’s remarks at a global forum on aging reversibility.

Note: This article preserves sources and descriptions as reported in public coverage; the flicker-stage model is presented as a behavioral and lifestyle framework, not a validated medical intervention.

Share

Topics

Kevin Morgan

Kevin Morgan is a senior food and dining writer for Times Media Service, based in Los Angeles, California. Morgan covers food and dining, along with sports and health, bringing an evidence-based, community-focused approach to health reporting. Morgan holds a master's degree in sport administration and grew up in Canton, Ohio.

Write to Kevin